The document discusses various laws and court cases related to discrimination and education in the US, including desegregation efforts beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. It also covers student assessment and accountability measures implemented in Texas, such as the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) exam and requirements for adequate yearly progress under the No Child Left Behind Act.
The document summarizes the 1968 Supreme Court case Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. It discusses how New Kent County in Virginia maintained a segregated school system with one all-white school and one all-black school, despite the Brown v. Board of Education ruling. To comply with desegregation orders, the school board implemented a freedom of choice plan that allowed students to choose which school to attend but did not result in desegregation. The Supreme Court ruled the plan unconstitutional, stating school boards must take effective steps to transition to a nondiscriminatory system.
1) The SF Board of Education passed a resolution restating its commitment to providing education to all students regardless of immigration status. It opposed recent ICE raids that caused immigrant families to fear sending children to school.
2) The resolution outlined policies prohibiting staff from inquiring about student immigration status, requiring unnecessary documentation, or referring families to immigration enforcement.
3) The Board directed training staff on the new policy and notifying families in multiple languages of their educational rights. It also committed to consulting immigrant organizations to monitor successful policy implementation.
This document provides an overview of public school law in Texas, including sources of law such as constitutional law, statutory law, administrative law, and judicial law. It discusses key laws and court cases that have shaped education policy. It also summarizes Texas laws on school finance, parental rights, and options for private and home schooling.
Racial segregation in public schools was established by the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision that upheld the doctrine of "separate but equal". This legalized racial segregation until the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision overturned it, finding that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. However, desegregation progressed slowly. Subsequent court cases dealt with how to enforce desegregation through measures such as busing students across districts, with mixed results regarding limiting desegregation orders. The 2007 Parents Involved decision placed new restrictions on considering race as a factor in student assignments.
Public schools fall under state control according to the 10th Amendment. States have police power over education and set curriculum standards, while school boards are the local policy-making entities. Teachers are in a contractual relationship with school boards and must follow their policies. Students have constitutional rights to freedom of expression, protest, limited censorship, and due process. Schools aim to provide a safe environment and have policies against violence, bullying, and gangs, enforcing discipline fairly while respecting students' rights. Parents and students have rights regarding access and privacy of educational records.
This document discusses several topics related to the education of youths serving long prison sentences:
1. It outlines federal mandates requiring that incarcerated youth receive regular and special education services according to federal disability and public education laws.
2. It provides examples of specific state rules in Arizona and New York regarding the separation and education of juvenile inmates.
3. It discusses challenges such as low enrollment of juvenile lifers in educational programs and the transition from receiving educational services to aging out of the system.
4. It presents strategies for educators to effectively engage juvenile inmates and establish structured educational programming during incarceration.
The document discusses various laws and court cases related to discrimination and education in the US, including desegregation efforts beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. It also covers student assessment and accountability measures implemented in Texas, such as the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) exam and requirements for adequate yearly progress under the No Child Left Behind Act.
The document summarizes the 1968 Supreme Court case Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. It discusses how New Kent County in Virginia maintained a segregated school system with one all-white school and one all-black school, despite the Brown v. Board of Education ruling. To comply with desegregation orders, the school board implemented a freedom of choice plan that allowed students to choose which school to attend but did not result in desegregation. The Supreme Court ruled the plan unconstitutional, stating school boards must take effective steps to transition to a nondiscriminatory system.
1) The SF Board of Education passed a resolution restating its commitment to providing education to all students regardless of immigration status. It opposed recent ICE raids that caused immigrant families to fear sending children to school.
2) The resolution outlined policies prohibiting staff from inquiring about student immigration status, requiring unnecessary documentation, or referring families to immigration enforcement.
3) The Board directed training staff on the new policy and notifying families in multiple languages of their educational rights. It also committed to consulting immigrant organizations to monitor successful policy implementation.
This document provides an overview of public school law in Texas, including sources of law such as constitutional law, statutory law, administrative law, and judicial law. It discusses key laws and court cases that have shaped education policy. It also summarizes Texas laws on school finance, parental rights, and options for private and home schooling.
Racial segregation in public schools was established by the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision that upheld the doctrine of "separate but equal". This legalized racial segregation until the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision overturned it, finding that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. However, desegregation progressed slowly. Subsequent court cases dealt with how to enforce desegregation through measures such as busing students across districts, with mixed results regarding limiting desegregation orders. The 2007 Parents Involved decision placed new restrictions on considering race as a factor in student assignments.
Public schools fall under state control according to the 10th Amendment. States have police power over education and set curriculum standards, while school boards are the local policy-making entities. Teachers are in a contractual relationship with school boards and must follow their policies. Students have constitutional rights to freedom of expression, protest, limited censorship, and due process. Schools aim to provide a safe environment and have policies against violence, bullying, and gangs, enforcing discipline fairly while respecting students' rights. Parents and students have rights regarding access and privacy of educational records.
This document discusses several topics related to the education of youths serving long prison sentences:
1. It outlines federal mandates requiring that incarcerated youth receive regular and special education services according to federal disability and public education laws.
2. It provides examples of specific state rules in Arizona and New York regarding the separation and education of juvenile inmates.
3. It discusses challenges such as low enrollment of juvenile lifers in educational programs and the transition from receiving educational services to aging out of the system.
4. It presents strategies for educators to effectively engage juvenile inmates and establish structured educational programming during incarceration.
The document discusses various laws and court cases related to discrimination and compulsory education in the US. It covers landmark rulings like Brown v. Board of Education that desegregated schools, as well as laws like the Civil Rights Act and IDEA protecting students. It also summarizes Texas laws regarding curriculum requirements, student assessment, accountability, and the effects of No Child Left Behind.
Presentation on Law of Bullying for CCAmmascolo424
The document discusses legal rights and responsibilities regarding bullying of students under Connecticut law. It outlines students' rights to a safe school environment and privacy, as well as boards of education's duties to address bullying. The law defines bullying and requires schools to have anti-bullying policies and procedures for reporting, investigating, and responding to bullying incidents. Challenges include ensuring policies are properly implemented and balancing various legal rights and responsibilities.
This document provides an overview of legal responsibilities and best practices for promoting safe and inclusive schools. It discusses:
- Federal and California laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment in schools based on characteristics like gender, disability, and sexual orientation.
- Examples of prohibited behaviors like name-calling and threats.
- New laws like AB 1266 ensuring transgender students' access to programs and facilities.
- The impact of harassment on students and importance of addressing it promptly.
- Strategies and exercises for schools to comply with laws and support all students.
Ch. 5 Legal Issues in American Schooling - Dr. William Allan KritsonisWilliam Kritsonis
1. The document discusses several key legal issues in American schooling, including the constitutional basis of education and the separation of church and state.
2. It outlines that the Tenth Amendment gives states responsibility for public education and that state constitutions provide for this. Local boards of education derive their power from state governments.
3. Courts have largely upheld the separation of church and state in schools, prohibiting organized religious activities but allowing voluntary student participation outside of school. Students' and teachers' rights are also addressed.
Constitutional Issues in Public Education: A Legal and Practical Primer
A Presentation for the Colorado Charter School Conference by Joseph B. Urban on February 26, 2015.
This letter urges the Seattle Public School Board and administration to clarify plans to support students displaced by the redevelopment of Yesler Terrace housing. It notes that the redevelopment will temporarily relocate families for 5-10 years, threatening educational stability. It argues the district has a legal obligation under the McKinney-Vento Act to identify homeless students and ensure transportation, academic support, and school choice. The letter requests the district adopt a comprehensive plan to mitigate harm to displaced Yesler Terrace youth.
A N O V E R V I E W O F E D U C A T I O N L A W, T E X A S S C H O O L ...William Kritsonis
Educational Background
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis earned his BA in 1969 from Central Washington University, Ellensburg, Washington. In 1971, he earned his M.Ed. from Seattle Pacific University. In 1976, he earned his PhD from the University of Iowa. In 1981, he was a Visiting Scholar at Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, and in 1987 was a Visiting Scholar at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. In June 2008, Dr. Kritsonis received the Doctor of Humane Letters, School of Graduate Studies from Southern Christian University. The ceremony was held at the Hilton Hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, School Law Power Point Presentation, Educational Laws & Policies, Due Process, Employment Law, Personnel Law, Equal Rights, Discrimination, Diversity, Teacher Rights, Termination of Employment
The document summarizes major events in the history of education reform in the United States from the 1950s to present day, focusing on increased recognition of students' individual rights. It discusses key court cases like Brown v. Board of Education that desegregated schools and Tinker v. Des Moines that established free speech rights for students. Major federal education laws like the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Education for All Handicapped Children Act, Goals 2000, and No Child Left Behind Act are also summarized along with ongoing debates around standardization and accountability versus flexibility and local control in education policy.
The document discusses the evolution of Title IX in American higher education from its origins in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Higher Education Act of 1965 to modern implementations and interpretations. It established protections against sex-based discrimination in educational programs that receive federal funding. Over time, the scope of Title IX expanded through court cases and guidance documents. It now addresses issues like sexual harassment, assault, and equal treatment and opportunities across university programs and services. Continuing discussion focuses on ensuring Title IX supports gender equity while recognizing complex issues around sex, gender, and institutional policies.
Dr. Fred C. Lunenburg, Published in FOCUS ON COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND SCH...William Kritsonis
Dr. Fred C. Lunenburg, Published in FOCUS ON COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND SCHOOLS, www.nationalforum.com - NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS - Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Editor-in-Chief, Houston, Texas
Laws Affecting And Protecting Homeless Youthswood97
This document summarizes several laws and acts that protect homeless, runaway, and throwaway youth in America. It discusses the McKinney-Vento Act which aims to protect the rights of homeless students and ensure equal education access. It also outlines the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act which established a national reporting system and services to assist runaway and homeless youth. Finally, it notes other relevant laws like FERPA, IDEA, and free school lunch provisions that provide protections and support for homeless youth.
When the Chair is Empty… How Do We Provide FAPE When Students Aren’t In School?Best Best and Krieger LLP
Chronic Absenteeism and Truancy:
1) Why Do We Care So Much?
2) Applicable Rules Requiring District Action.
3) Legal Challenges and Practical Ways to Successfully Blend Statutory Obligations to Help Ensure Student Success.
Ch 15 Legalities Affecting Schooling - Dr. William Allan KritsonisWilliam Kritsonis
This chapter discusses important federal legislation and court cases that have impacted education in America. It outlines several key acts of Congress from the late 18th century to the late 20th century that established public schools, provided funding for vocational education, supported students with limited English skills, and mandated services for students with disabilities. It also summarizes several landmark Supreme Court cases, including Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled that racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional, and Tinker v. Des Moines, which established students' rights to freedom of expression.
The Rights of Immigrant Students and English Language Learners in the Public ...RogerRosenthal
This document summarizes the rights of immigrant children and English language learners in public schools. It discusses landmark Supreme Court cases like Plyer v. Doe that established the right of all children to attend public schools regardless of immigration status. It also covers issues like required documentation for enrollment, language access requirements, and restrictions on sharing immigration information. The document is intended to provide an overview of the complex legal issues around educating immigrant and English learner students.
This presentation discusses the history of special education and the legislation that has shaped it. It begins by covering early court cases that established the separate but equal doctrine and made it difficult for students with disabilities to receive an education. The 1954 Supreme Court decision declared separate but unequal in education. Subsequent cases and laws including the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act have provided students with disabilities the right to a free and appropriate public education and protections in the special education process. Special education has come a long way thanks to these legislative changes.
The document provides an overview of key topics in school law, including the legal system, types of laws, how laws are made and enforced, landmark Supreme Court rulings affecting education, and other legal issues pertaining to schools such as desegregation, school finance, student and teacher rights, special education, church-state separation, and school choice. Key Supreme Court cases discussed include Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled that segregation was unequal, and San Antonio v. Rodriguez, which found that education is not a fundamental right.
DEBATE 22 EDUCATION POLICYASSIGNING STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS BA.docxedwardmarivel
DEBATE
22
EDUCATION POLICY
ASSIGNING STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS BASED ON RACE:
Justified or Unacceptable? ADVOCATE: National Education Association, et al.
JUSTIFIED
SOURCE: Amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents
Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007) UNACCEPTABLE
ADVOCATE: Asian American Legal Foundation
SOURCE: Amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents
Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007)
The intersection between education and race has long sparked emotional debate. Prior to the Civil War it was uncommon and in some places illegal to educate children who were not white. The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) requiring equal protection of the law for all citizens made it illegal to overtly deny children of color an education or to give them an expressly inferior one. However, the changes were more cosmetic that substantive. In many places, Jim Crow laws legalized accommo- dations that were supposedly “separate but equal,” but in reality were highly unequal. Blacks were the most numerous victims, but Asian Americans, Hispanics, and others also were relegated to second-class facilities and services. The Supreme Court upheld this fictitious equality in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), a case that involved railroad car accommodations but also applied to schools and many other points of segregation. That decision stood until the Supreme Court overturned it in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Writing for the unanimous court, Chief Justice Earl Warren opined that in “public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
Over the years, the application Brown v. Board of Education slowly eliminated the overtly intentional school segregation, but, like the Fourteenth Amendment, there was a large gap between theoretical importance and practical impact. Two factors lim- ited Brown. One was that some school districts build schools or drew district lines in ways that maintained or created schools that were de facto racially segregated. The second factor involved living patterns. Whites fled cities to the suburbs or sent their children to private schools to avoid racially integrated schools, and urban schools became more and more minority dominated. These population shifts also left cities with diminished tax bases, and the schools declined for want of adequate funding.
In response, the courts moved to a more proactive stance. In a case involving the region centered on Charlotte, North Carolina, where schools remained very segre- gated and the school board resisted moving to desegregate, a federal judge in 1965 found that the segregation was intentional, ordered that all 105 schools integrate, and specified that children be bussed between schools in necessary. The Supreme Court in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971) unanimously backed
2
John T. Rourke, You Decide! 2012 Copy.
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
More Related Content
Similar to S T U D E N T A T T E N D A N C E A N D I N S T R U C
The document discusses various laws and court cases related to discrimination and compulsory education in the US. It covers landmark rulings like Brown v. Board of Education that desegregated schools, as well as laws like the Civil Rights Act and IDEA protecting students. It also summarizes Texas laws regarding curriculum requirements, student assessment, accountability, and the effects of No Child Left Behind.
Presentation on Law of Bullying for CCAmmascolo424
The document discusses legal rights and responsibilities regarding bullying of students under Connecticut law. It outlines students' rights to a safe school environment and privacy, as well as boards of education's duties to address bullying. The law defines bullying and requires schools to have anti-bullying policies and procedures for reporting, investigating, and responding to bullying incidents. Challenges include ensuring policies are properly implemented and balancing various legal rights and responsibilities.
This document provides an overview of legal responsibilities and best practices for promoting safe and inclusive schools. It discusses:
- Federal and California laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment in schools based on characteristics like gender, disability, and sexual orientation.
- Examples of prohibited behaviors like name-calling and threats.
- New laws like AB 1266 ensuring transgender students' access to programs and facilities.
- The impact of harassment on students and importance of addressing it promptly.
- Strategies and exercises for schools to comply with laws and support all students.
Ch. 5 Legal Issues in American Schooling - Dr. William Allan KritsonisWilliam Kritsonis
1. The document discusses several key legal issues in American schooling, including the constitutional basis of education and the separation of church and state.
2. It outlines that the Tenth Amendment gives states responsibility for public education and that state constitutions provide for this. Local boards of education derive their power from state governments.
3. Courts have largely upheld the separation of church and state in schools, prohibiting organized religious activities but allowing voluntary student participation outside of school. Students' and teachers' rights are also addressed.
Constitutional Issues in Public Education: A Legal and Practical Primer
A Presentation for the Colorado Charter School Conference by Joseph B. Urban on February 26, 2015.
This letter urges the Seattle Public School Board and administration to clarify plans to support students displaced by the redevelopment of Yesler Terrace housing. It notes that the redevelopment will temporarily relocate families for 5-10 years, threatening educational stability. It argues the district has a legal obligation under the McKinney-Vento Act to identify homeless students and ensure transportation, academic support, and school choice. The letter requests the district adopt a comprehensive plan to mitigate harm to displaced Yesler Terrace youth.
A N O V E R V I E W O F E D U C A T I O N L A W, T E X A S S C H O O L ...William Kritsonis
Educational Background
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis earned his BA in 1969 from Central Washington University, Ellensburg, Washington. In 1971, he earned his M.Ed. from Seattle Pacific University. In 1976, he earned his PhD from the University of Iowa. In 1981, he was a Visiting Scholar at Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, and in 1987 was a Visiting Scholar at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. In June 2008, Dr. Kritsonis received the Doctor of Humane Letters, School of Graduate Studies from Southern Christian University. The ceremony was held at the Hilton Hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, School Law Power Point Presentation, Educational Laws & Policies, Due Process, Employment Law, Personnel Law, Equal Rights, Discrimination, Diversity, Teacher Rights, Termination of Employment
The document summarizes major events in the history of education reform in the United States from the 1950s to present day, focusing on increased recognition of students' individual rights. It discusses key court cases like Brown v. Board of Education that desegregated schools and Tinker v. Des Moines that established free speech rights for students. Major federal education laws like the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Education for All Handicapped Children Act, Goals 2000, and No Child Left Behind Act are also summarized along with ongoing debates around standardization and accountability versus flexibility and local control in education policy.
The document discusses the evolution of Title IX in American higher education from its origins in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Higher Education Act of 1965 to modern implementations and interpretations. It established protections against sex-based discrimination in educational programs that receive federal funding. Over time, the scope of Title IX expanded through court cases and guidance documents. It now addresses issues like sexual harassment, assault, and equal treatment and opportunities across university programs and services. Continuing discussion focuses on ensuring Title IX supports gender equity while recognizing complex issues around sex, gender, and institutional policies.
Dr. Fred C. Lunenburg, Published in FOCUS ON COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND SCH...William Kritsonis
Dr. Fred C. Lunenburg, Published in FOCUS ON COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND SCHOOLS, www.nationalforum.com - NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS - Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Editor-in-Chief, Houston, Texas
Laws Affecting And Protecting Homeless Youthswood97
This document summarizes several laws and acts that protect homeless, runaway, and throwaway youth in America. It discusses the McKinney-Vento Act which aims to protect the rights of homeless students and ensure equal education access. It also outlines the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act which established a national reporting system and services to assist runaway and homeless youth. Finally, it notes other relevant laws like FERPA, IDEA, and free school lunch provisions that provide protections and support for homeless youth.
When the Chair is Empty… How Do We Provide FAPE When Students Aren’t In School?Best Best and Krieger LLP
Chronic Absenteeism and Truancy:
1) Why Do We Care So Much?
2) Applicable Rules Requiring District Action.
3) Legal Challenges and Practical Ways to Successfully Blend Statutory Obligations to Help Ensure Student Success.
Ch 15 Legalities Affecting Schooling - Dr. William Allan KritsonisWilliam Kritsonis
This chapter discusses important federal legislation and court cases that have impacted education in America. It outlines several key acts of Congress from the late 18th century to the late 20th century that established public schools, provided funding for vocational education, supported students with limited English skills, and mandated services for students with disabilities. It also summarizes several landmark Supreme Court cases, including Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled that racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional, and Tinker v. Des Moines, which established students' rights to freedom of expression.
The Rights of Immigrant Students and English Language Learners in the Public ...RogerRosenthal
This document summarizes the rights of immigrant children and English language learners in public schools. It discusses landmark Supreme Court cases like Plyer v. Doe that established the right of all children to attend public schools regardless of immigration status. It also covers issues like required documentation for enrollment, language access requirements, and restrictions on sharing immigration information. The document is intended to provide an overview of the complex legal issues around educating immigrant and English learner students.
This presentation discusses the history of special education and the legislation that has shaped it. It begins by covering early court cases that established the separate but equal doctrine and made it difficult for students with disabilities to receive an education. The 1954 Supreme Court decision declared separate but unequal in education. Subsequent cases and laws including the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act have provided students with disabilities the right to a free and appropriate public education and protections in the special education process. Special education has come a long way thanks to these legislative changes.
The document provides an overview of key topics in school law, including the legal system, types of laws, how laws are made and enforced, landmark Supreme Court rulings affecting education, and other legal issues pertaining to schools such as desegregation, school finance, student and teacher rights, special education, church-state separation, and school choice. Key Supreme Court cases discussed include Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled that segregation was unequal, and San Antonio v. Rodriguez, which found that education is not a fundamental right.
DEBATE 22 EDUCATION POLICYASSIGNING STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS BA.docxedwardmarivel
DEBATE
22
EDUCATION POLICY
ASSIGNING STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS BASED ON RACE:
Justified or Unacceptable? ADVOCATE: National Education Association, et al.
JUSTIFIED
SOURCE: Amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents
Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007) UNACCEPTABLE
ADVOCATE: Asian American Legal Foundation
SOURCE: Amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents
Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007)
The intersection between education and race has long sparked emotional debate. Prior to the Civil War it was uncommon and in some places illegal to educate children who were not white. The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) requiring equal protection of the law for all citizens made it illegal to overtly deny children of color an education or to give them an expressly inferior one. However, the changes were more cosmetic that substantive. In many places, Jim Crow laws legalized accommo- dations that were supposedly “separate but equal,” but in reality were highly unequal. Blacks were the most numerous victims, but Asian Americans, Hispanics, and others also were relegated to second-class facilities and services. The Supreme Court upheld this fictitious equality in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), a case that involved railroad car accommodations but also applied to schools and many other points of segregation. That decision stood until the Supreme Court overturned it in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Writing for the unanimous court, Chief Justice Earl Warren opined that in “public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
Over the years, the application Brown v. Board of Education slowly eliminated the overtly intentional school segregation, but, like the Fourteenth Amendment, there was a large gap between theoretical importance and practical impact. Two factors lim- ited Brown. One was that some school districts build schools or drew district lines in ways that maintained or created schools that were de facto racially segregated. The second factor involved living patterns. Whites fled cities to the suburbs or sent their children to private schools to avoid racially integrated schools, and urban schools became more and more minority dominated. These population shifts also left cities with diminished tax bases, and the schools declined for want of adequate funding.
In response, the courts moved to a more proactive stance. In a case involving the region centered on Charlotte, North Carolina, where schools remained very segre- gated and the school board resisted moving to desegregate, a federal judge in 1965 found that the segregation was intentional, ordered that all 105 schools integrate, and specified that children be bussed between schools in necessary. The Supreme Court in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971) unanimously backed
2
John T. Rourke, You Decide! 2012 Copy.
Similar to S T U D E N T A T T E N D A N C E A N D I N S T R U C (20)
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.